Trying not to bore you guys to death, here go some points:
- Fertility problem: I would say the biggest issue concerning today's birth rate in highly developed countries is the aging of the overall population. This means that as the general population get older (and thus become non-productive), and the working population decreases (in the sense that there is more people getting "out" of productive status than people getting in), the concern is that the country will loose competitiveness in the global economy scene aswell as face BIG difficulties in mantaining it's own financial structure "healthy" (as it is seen today) - namely being unable to pay retirement and social care bills when there isn't enough taxes income, put simply. The answer range from encouraging young couple to, erm... "couple" and have more kids, to enouraging immigration (yes, this might sound dreadful to most uneducated people out there but a lot of european countries are actually counting on immigrants' working population to balance the internal economy in the near future, like Portugal, thus saving our daddies retirements <!-- s;) --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><!-- s;) --> Just being mean, that's all).
Of course in the movie this isn't the case, as it was never explained why, in the ENTIRE world, all women became infertile in a sudden time-frame. It isn't that absurd though as it is known women do not ovulate for as long as the body conditions are not "right" (periods of dry or lack of food, etc), just like other mammals. Maybe in the movie it was also some kind of terrible genetical evolution step that doomed the human kind to extinction, but that's not the point of the movie, anyways.
- Preconceit: I would add that the point in being open-minded is very simple, and probably comes from science rational views: all of our opinions and views of the world in which we firmly believe and to which we act upon are always a product of a certain context, and history has proved time and time again that what we may think is totally right today is likely and almost ALWAYS bound to be proven wrong tomorrow by a more elucidated view. So it's simple, if you want to keep your ignorance level to a minimun, you will want to be as much "open-minded" as possible, about everything.
Homosexuality is common in many highly developed animal species including humans, from my limited knowledge it serves many purpouses in social relationships and individual's emotional grouth (both for males and females). What we would call "chronic" homosexuality in the cases of persons who have natural atraction to the same sex, is already proven to have biological origin and thus cannot be considered a pervertion in any way. I'm no expert obviously but I do tend to be offended when I hear it's "unnatural" and "wrong" to be homosexual because it means the person cannot break through his cultural baggage and has chosen the easy way of agreeing with the majority (not saying the case here, just saying in general). If you are NOT attracted to the same sex, ok, but if you are OFFENDED by homosexuality it means your view is influenced by moral and ethical poisitions that by the very definition of it, are NOT "natural" as morality in any of it's forms is a creation of social beings like humans, and like I said, is bound to be different tomorrow, for the better ot worse (according to each person's beliefs).
Sorry for the long post, just expressing my opinions, I know it's hard to read so much from a not so bright person as myself, but... <!-- s:wink: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" /><!-- s:wink: -->